brainroads-toward-tomorrows mental patterns

pyramid2dna

pyramid to dna

Brainroads © ℠, brainscapes © ℠ and timescapes © ℠




Brainroads

Imagine you're reading about the allied invasion during World War II. You can progress from word to word or place yourself in the situation and progress from scene to scene exploring each for full information—emotions, strategizing etc. The attention–directing and re-directing that is taking place in the scene to scene mode is what I call traveling a brainroad © ℠. It is a dynamic mental movie from beginning to end. Traveling a brainroad is not restricted to reading.

Dense listening and dense reading

Mentally viewing a job interview could be traveled as a brainroad.

Thinking through the evolution of major company like Apple could be treated as a brainroad. You're not just reading the milestones, key events, or a biography. You're in the midst of the action and reactions. You experience fear, decision anxiety etc.

Imagine your boss comes into your office and tells you to clean out your desk. You no longer have a job there. Now look down two brainroads. Reflect back over all the tasks you performed during your period of employment. What value were they? No look forward and imagine the next few months/years of your life.

Note to self: add Edward de Bono beliefs and humor examples

Career and life brainroad examples

The World is Full of Options (dissect, harvest, and calendarize?)

The Wisdom of Peter Drucker by Bob Buford (dissect, harvest, and calendarize?)

Ten Principles for Life II (dissect, harvest, and calendarize?)

Peter's Principles (dissect, harvest, and calendarize?)

Josh Abrams story (dissect, harvest, and calendarize?)

My (Peter Drucker's) Life as a Knowledge Worker (dissect, harvest, and calendarize?)

The Individual In Entrepreneurial Society (dissect, harvest and calendarize?)

Interview: Post-Capitalist Executive (dissect, harvest, and calendarize?)

Interview: Managing in a Post-Capitalist Society (dissect, harvest, and calendarize?)

Drucker Essay Collections

Although written years ago, these essays can be valuable attention directing tools. They can take your brain to places (brain addresses and brain roads) it wouldn't naturally go. What has changed and what is likely to change?

bbx Technology, Management and Society

bbx Men, Ideas & Politics

bbx Toward the Next Economics and Other Essays

bbx The Ecological Vision: Reflections on the American Condition

bbx A Functioning Society: Selections from Sixty-Five Years of Writing on Community, Society, and Polity


Brainscape

A brainroad is a time line while a brainscape is static "landscape" view that captures a moment in "time." Brainscapes can evolve.

Some examples

Changing social and economic picture

Economic content and structure

organization evolution overview

Organization evolution concept map

A world moving in time, conceptual resources, harvesting action areas, thinking, doing. Larger

Links to topics above

Timescape

An unfolding view of the social and economic world. If the social and economic world could be captured with time lapse photography that would be a timescape. I'll revisit this later.

The Sweep of History

 


 

 


 

Anticipating and Planning Technology (an example)

The "unpredictability of technology" is an old slogan.

Indeed, it underlies to a considerable extent the widespread "fear of technology."

But it is not even true that invention is incapable of being anticipated and planned.

Indeed, what made the "great inventors" of the nineteenth century—Edison, Siemens, or the Wright brothers—"great" was precisely that they knew how to anticipate technology, to define what was needed and would be likely to have real impact, and to plan technological activity for the specific breakthrough that would have the greatest technological impact—and, as a result, the greatest economic impact.


It is even more true in respect to "innovation" that we can anticipate and plan; indeed, with respect to "innovation," we have to anticipate and plan to have any effect.

And it is, of course, with "innovation" rather than with "invention" that the businessman is concerned.

Innovation is not a technical, but a social and economic, term.

It is a change in the wealth-producing capacity of resources through new ways of doing things.

It is not identical with "invention," although it will often follow from it.

It is the impact on economic capacity, the capacity to produce and to utilize resources, with which "innovation" is concerned.

And this is the area in which business is engaged.


It should be said that technology is no more "predictable" than anything else.

In fact, predictions of technology are, at best, useless and are likely to be totally misleading.

Jules Verne, the French science fiction writer of a hundred years ago, is remembered today because his predictions have turned out to be amazingly prophetic.

What is forgotten is that Jules Verne was only one of several hundred science fiction writers of the late nineteenth century—which indeed was far more the age of science fiction writing than even the present decade.

And the other 299 science fiction writers of the time, whose popularity often rivaled and sometimes exceeded that of Jules Verne, were all completely wrong.

More important, however, no one could have done anything at the time with Jules Verne's predictions.

For most of them, the scientific foundations needed to create the predicted technology did not exist at the time and would not come into being for many years ahead.


For the businessman-but also for the economist or politician-what matters is not "prediction," but the capacity to act.

And this cannot be based on "prediction."


But technology can be anticipated.

It is not too difficult—though not easy—to analyze existing businesses, existing industries, existing economies and markets to find where a change in technology is needed and is likely to prove economically effective.

It is somewhat less easy, though still well within human limitations, to think through the areas in which there exists high potential for new and effective technology.


We can say flatly first that wherever an industry enjoys high and rising demand, without being able to show corresponding profitability, there is need for major technological change and opportunity for it.

Such an industry can be assumed, almost axiomatically, to have inadequate, uneconomic, or plainly inappropriate technology.

Examples of such industries would be the steel industry in the developed countries since World War II or the paper industry.

These are industries in which fairly minor changes in process, that is, fairly minor changes in technology, can be expected to produce major changes in the economics of the industry.

Therefore, these are the industries which can become "technology prone."

The process either is economically deficient or it is technically deficient-and sometimes both.


We can similarly find "vulnerabilities" and "restraints" which provide opportunities for new technology in the economics of a business and in market and market structure.

The questions:

what are the demands of customer and market which the present business and the present technology do not adequately satisfy?, and:

What are the unsatisfied demands of customer and market?—that is, the basic questions underlying market planning—are also the basic questions to define what technologies are needed, appropriate, and likely to produce economic results with minimum effort.


A particularly fruitful way to identify areas in which technological innovations might be both accessible and highly productive is to ask: "What are we afraid of in this business and in this industry?

What are the things which all assert 'can never happen,' but which we nonetheless know perfectly well might happen and could then threaten us?

Where, in other words, do we ourselves know at the bottom of our hearts that our products, our technology, our whole approach to the satisfaction we provide to market and customer, is not truly appropriate and no longer completely serves its function?"

The typical response of a business to these questions is to deny that they have validity.

It is the responsibility of the manager who wants to manage technology for the benefit of his business and of his society to overcome this almost reflexive response and to force himself and his business to take these questions seriously.

What is needed is not always new technology.

It might equally be a shift to new markets or to new distributive channels.

But unless the question is asked, technological opportunities will be missed, will indeed be misconceived as "threats."


These approaches, of which only the barest sketch can be given in this essay, apply just as well to needs of the society as to needs of the market.

It is, after all, the function of the businessman to convert need, whether of individual consumer or of the community, into opportunities for business.

It is for the identification and satisfaction of that need that business and businessmen get paid.

Today's major problems, whether of the city, of the environment, or energy, are similarly opportunities for new technology and for converting existing technology into effective economic action.

At the same time, businessmen in managing technology also have to start out from the needs of their own business for new products, new processes, new services to replace what is rapidly becoming old and obsolescent, that is, to replace today.

To identify technological needs and technological opportunities one also starts out, therefore, with the assumption that whatever one's business is doing today is likely to be obsolete fairly soon.


This approach assumes a limited and fairly short life for whatever present products, present processes, and present technologies are being applied.

It then establishes a "gap," that is, the sales volume which products and processes not yet in existence will have to fill in two, five, or ten years.

It thus identifies the scope and extent of technological effort needed.

But it also establishes what kind of effort is needed.

For it determines why present products and processes are likely to become obsolescent, and it establishes the specifications for their replacement.


Finally, to be able to anticipate technology, to identify what is needed and what is possible, and above all what is likely to be productive technology, the business manager needs to understand the dynamics of technology.

It is simply not true that technology is "mysterious."

It follows fairly regular and fairly predictable trends.

It is not, as is often said, "science."

It is not even the "application of science."

But it does begin with new knowledge which is then, in a fairly well-understood process, converted into effective—that is, economically productive—application.

Toward the Next Economics and Other Essays
by Peter Drucker

List of topics in this Folder

Keywords: tlnkwbrainroad tlnkwbrainscape tlnkwtimescape

 

“The greatest danger in times of turbulence is not turbulence; it is to act with yesterday’s logic”. — Peter Drucker


The shift from manual workers who do as they are being told — either by the task or by the boss — to knowledge workers who have to manage themselves ↓ profoundly challenges social structure

Managing Oneself is a REVOLUTION in human affairs.” … “It also requires an almost 180-degree change in the knowledge workers’ thoughts and actions from what most of us—even of the younger generation—still take for granted as the way to think and the way to act.” …

… “Managing Oneself is based on the very opposite realities: Workers are likely to outlive organizations (and therefore, employers can’t be depended on for designing your life), and the knowledge worker has mobility.” ← in a context

 

line

 

These pages are attention directing tools for navigating a world moving toward unimagined futures.

It’s up to you to figure out what to harvest and calendarize
working something out in time (1915, 1940, 1970 … 2040 … the outer limit of your concern)nobody is going to do it for you.

It may be a step forward to actively reject something (rather than just passively ignoring) and then figure out a coping plan for what you’ve rejected.

Your future is between your ears and our future is between our collective ears — it can’t be otherwise. A site exploration starting point

 

Google
WWW rlaexp.com

To create a rlaexp.com site search on Google’s site ↓

Type the following in the search box on the Google’s site:

your search text site:rlaexp.com

intelligence-instructions

 

What needs doing?

 

contact

 

Donations: Please click the button below to make a donation through PayPal.

Other forms of PayPal payment besides donations


Why donate?



Copyright 2001 2005 2007 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 © All rights reserved | bobembry | bob embry | “time life navigation” © | “life TIME investment system” © | “career evolution” © | “life design” © | “organization evolution” © | “brainroads toward tomorrows” © | “foundations for future directed decisions” ©

rlaexp.comreal life adventures + exploration

More info …