pyramid to dna

brainroads-toward-tomorrows mental patterns

Venture Firms Hard on Even Best Entrepreneurs—Study

Source: Yahoo news

Technology - Reuters

Wed Sep 11, 1:45 PM ET 2003

By Jim Christie

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - While high-tech entrepreneurs often worry about the risk of failure, a new study shows they also need to be concerned about the risk of success -- especially if they are backed by venture capitalists.

Venture firms routinely dump money-losing entrepreneurs, but even founders of successful start-ups are not safe, according to a recent study by Warren Boeker, a University of Washington Business School professor.

Boeker found that 35 percent of founders of successful start-ups lost their jobs within five years of their company's launch after investors decided new management could do even better.

"It's a double-edged sword," Boeker told Reuters on Tuesday. "If you are an entrepreneur and have a great idea, you are going to be able to attract more money easily, but you are probably going to have to give up your control and position."

Boeker tracked 434 entrepreneurs between 1983 and 1999, and found investors often bumped those who did well, assuming they would not be able to shift their companies into higher gear by taking products to market or launching public stock offerings.

"Where venture capitalists have greater ownership, they tend to do this to a greater extent," Boeker said. "They really want to make sure they have what they call 'great people' in place."

"They have experience managing larger businesses, they understand things like marketing and channel distribution and management, and they understand how to deal with the financial community," Boeker said.


Founders of venture-backed start-ups often leave much wealthier than when they launched their companies, but forced exits can lead to hard feelings and dashed dreams.

That can't be avoided if start-ups are to survive, said Brown Venture Associates partner Dan Lankford, a venture capitalist and recruiter of CEOs for start-ups.

"If a founder doesn't want to bring in a professional CEO you have to wonder how the company will work out," Lankford said, noting that start-up founders with technology backgrounds often are overwhelmed by general business demands.

Lankford said that savvy start-up founders know when to give up the day-to-day tasks of running a company.

One of the best know examples of that in Silicon Valley was when eBay Inc. founder Pierre Omidyar made way for a new CEO, Meg Whitman, in 1998. Whitman had served as a senior-level executive at toymaker Hasbro Inc. and the Walt Disney Co.

Boeker said he suspects the dot-com bust has driven turnover rates of start-up founders higher because venture firms have gained much greater say over how portfolio companies are managed than a few years ago.

"They're much more vigilant, much more careful, much more focused on oversight," Boeker said.

They're also able to wrangle bigger stakes of start-ups. The median value of a company closing venture funding was $11.1 million in the second quarter, or 57 percent below a record $25.9 million in early 2000, the hey-day of Internet start-ups, according to research firm VentureOne.

Copyright © 2002 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Copyright © 2002 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.


“The greatest danger in times of turbulence is not turbulence; it is to act with yesterday’s logic”. — Peter Drucker

The shift from manual workers who do as they are being told — either by the task or by the boss — to knowledge workers who have to manage themselves ↓ profoundly challenges social structure

Managing Oneself is a REVOLUTION in human affairs.” … “It also requires an almost 180-degree change in the knowledge workers’ thoughts and actions from what most of us—even of the younger generation—still take for granted as the way to think and the way to act.” …

… “Managing Oneself is based on the very opposite realities: Workers are likely to outlive organizations (and therefore, employers can’t be depended on for designing your life), and the knowledge worker has mobility.” ← in a context




These pages are attention directing tools for navigating a world moving toward unimagined futures.

It’s up to you to figure out what to harvest and calendarize
working something out in time (1915, 1940, 1970 … 2040 … the outer limit of your concern)nobody is going to do it for you.

It may be a step forward to actively reject something (rather than just passively ignoring) and then figure out a coping plan for what you’ve rejected.

Your future is between your ears and our future is between our collective ears — it can’t be otherwise. A site exploration starting point



To create a site search, go to Google’s site ↓

Type the following in their search box ↓

your search text



What needs doing?




Donations: Please click the button below to make a donation through PayPal.

Other forms of PayPal payment besides donations

Why donate?

Copyright 2001 2005 2007 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 © All rights reserved | bobembry | bob embry | “time life navigation” © | “life TIME investment system” © | “career evolution” © | “life design” © | “organization evolution” © | “brainroads toward tomorrows” © | “foundations for future directed decisions” © | #rlaexpdotcom © | rlaexpdomcom © = real life adventures + exploration

#rlaexpdotcom introduction breadcrumb trail …